Skip to main content

counting

Economics, Science, and Religion 5

[5]


previous     /     next slide

Up to the event of industrialization, a rigid, albeit slowly changing world view had prompted a mitigated hierarchy just as rigid:

  • Man was the image of God upon this world, but dependent on the whims of both; he was lord over the animals, but ultimately depended on them, and plants as well.
  • Man had to work hard for his daily bread, but without God's grace there would not be even that.
  • Man was the crown of Creation that had taken place some time ago, but still dependent on it like an infant.

And so on.


Despite these and other paradoxes, this world view, as a whole, was coherent - and still is.

But with the advent of mechanized, industrial mass production, this perception changed fundamentally, though not completely.

In the relevant areas of religion, economy and science, new and fundamental questions arose:

  • Is man in the image of God or just a whim of nature?
  • Is man the worldly creator of all values or just their consumer?
  • Is man dependent or free? (And from what?)
  • Is the universe nothing but an accumulation of randomized events, or, combined with universal evolution, a purposeful, irreversible affair?

And again, so on.


Without the frame of the prior rigid order, which found its justification in limited resources, man was thrown back on himself; he could only, temporarily, choose one of these alternatives and regularly lose the other.

But the result of such a choice is still only on the mind; nothing changes in reality, except perhaps one's own behavior. This could indicate that these alternatives, in reality, are not alternatives at all; and that an "and" may apply instead of an "or", sometimes.



Until about 1850, and in ancient religious systems even today, the general view could be described as follows:

The universe is static and eternal; it has an external source, God, who through Creation is the source of all things, such as resources; and therefore the distribution and allocation of the same is the responsibility of his worldly deputies and agents; and it is up to the people to prove themselves worthy of this allocation. Etc.

The result is coercion and oppression.


After about 1850, something like the following applied in the "West":

The universe is dynamic, temporary, it has no external source, God exists solely as an internal construct for one's self-orientation; the origin of all things is unknown, and therefore their distribution and allocation can rely solely on collective decision, while it is up to the individual to manufacture the necessary goods, etc.

The result is forsakenness and panic.

Even worse, overwork and exhaustion - and as a result, severe depression and mental derangement.


One could refer to the areas of religion, economics, and science as the "Three Sisters" of society, a seafaring expression - as the three areas of fatal, cardinal errors inundating the

Philosophy of Modern Man:

Evolution, Revolution, Entropy


previous     /     next slide

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

360 Degrees - Division in Time and Space

360 Degrees The partitioning of time and space into 360 steps Partitioning a whole into 360 degrees / 60 minutes with a compass and a ruler as universal instruments for the division of space and time The partitioning of a full circle as a representative of the whole into 360 degrees goes back to Babylonian times of farming and simple technology  - 5000 years ago, around 3000 BC to 300 BC. Our current decimal number system is based on the number 10; their numerical system was based on the number 60 . In those days, the emphasis was not , as it is today, on arbitrarily precise mathematics, but on those principally so; it was not about calculations ( these were then neither possible nor needed ), but about division and construction of artifacts with available aids . Within simple life, symmetry, dividing evenly, and fair and correct sharing, are of big, if not existential importance. Since reality itself is but an approximation on the mathematically correc
Post a Comment
Read more

Time Gravity Dip

Something to think about... Note that the end speed seems not to change, therefore the second law / conservation of energy is not violated -  but somewhere along the way, the effect of gravity shortens the overall time, thus increasing the overall speed (though the actual distance of travel also increased as well), so that the sphere with the longest way to travel paradoxically hits the target first . This works even in repetition:     Now imagine the opposite - a cannon ball shot (or a rock hurled) straight up into the air, to fall down exactly where it was: the distance is zero (or, if you miss, very short), but time did pass - and the speed of the projectile was much higher than can be inferred from that resulting 'distance'; in fact, the higher its velocity, the more time passes until it's return, and the slower or lower the resulting overall speed (remember that the trajectory of any missile on earth is always longer than the actual dist
Post a Comment
Read more

The most beautiful short poem ever

  Rooting for Alzheimers All the things you never did And all the things you do They all return in later years They all return to haunt you The most beautiful short poem ever   Flutter by, Butterfly   Sadly (or rather: gladly) as Google told me, I wasn't the only one to dream that one up. So, no copyright there; and so I tried to top that with the arguably less beautiful, but even shorter poem, the shortest possible ever, so there! I die That's it, Folks! ;-)
Post a Comment
Read more