Skip to main content

counting

Economics, Science, and Religion 3

[3]


previous     /     next slide

Just a decade after Darwin, in 1867, Karl Marx, consciously or not, (re-) instated the idea of human divinity by declaring human labor within the production process to be the sole creator, more or less, of what he named "added" or "surplus value", and therefore value per se.

This extra value was then, as he proposed, extorted from its producers by the exploiters of labor as something called money or capital; and this forever until the exploiters would be done away with, and the means of production (machines et al) were socialized into the collective of laborers.

Now, if humans are the sole creators of value, then this exploitation of labor can affect only humans, not animals or powered machines; even though the latter "means of production" were at the time just beginning to replace, not just complement humans as a main factor of production (as had hitherto animals - all three requiring an input of energy, often in the form of similar carbohydrates - but then these concepts were still widely unknown).

The work of humans, animals and machines is physically indistinguishable. And of course, humans did exploit animals; but no-one would have seriously thought of letting them keep their self-generated added value - or even of defining it; and, at the same time man became the "exploited" extension of machinery, he was equivalent to an animal in the exploitation of his labor.

But all the while humans were becoming increasingly similar to animals and machines as means of production - and might even perform the same labor resulting in the same product - the idea of exploited humans as the sole creators of value, and therefore entitled to its possession, reinstated in them that earthly likeness to God, by which man, to this day, continues to first "create" values, and then money - the latter, it seems, actually "from nothing", i. e. by fiat.


Every attempt to turn the consequences of this doctrine into "pure" economic practice, i. e. as socialism or communism, paradoxically has so far resulted in poverty, and often in mass death; the simple idea that human labor, exploited or not, creates value is obviously deficient - were it otherwise, owning slaves would be a sound economic model, and no free, working population would ever be poor.

Even more intriguing, its de facto counter-doctrine, the capitalist market economy - while being far more productive - is run on the same basic principle, namely, that added value is generated by work; beyond that, it has a rather more pragmatic, on the issue of wealth creation and its distribution almost Darwinistic approach, and as far as possible lets (and let) machines do the value adding work.

Again paradoxically, the shifting of the work load from humans to machines also took place in socialism, failing to clearly explain why the value previously created by exploitable humans could now be created by non-exploitable machines - and what the supposedly "added value" was based upon, except on a market evaluation.

Even more paradoxically, the more successful capitalist market system seemed to be "unsustainable", in the way that it could not be kept stable over a longer period of time; it seemed to rely on (real or imagined) "constant expansion" to outrun its self-generated problems, destroying vast sums of the self-generated money along the way; sometimes even, as in war, an instrument of mass death all by itself, the accumulated physical wealth.

Furthermore, and inexplicably in both systems, debt built up regularly; for this, too, there was no convincing explanation - where did all this debt come from, when added value was being produced, by machines obviously even more easily than by humans?


Now, if the two post-industrial economic systems as antagonistic as Capitalism and Communism bring about similar undesirable and detrimental results, to the point of seeming to "converge", then these "side effects" should have a common cause; and the common basis of both systems is the idea that value is created by labor, human or otherwise - an idea fraught with internal contradictions and unexpected consequences. 


Marx himself seems to have noticed that, for he and his successors made "discrepancies" and "contradictions", which would then have to be resolved socially, a central subject to their theory; but no coherent solution could be found for them, as they turned out to be as real as they were insurmountable by humans in practice (and as will be shown, in principle).

But - why was that?


previous     /     next slide


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Observations on Climate Change pt 1

Copied from  thermodynamicsociety.substack.com Introduction and historical Abstract   Cause and effect of past and future variations in the levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere and its surface temperature I shall assume , in the following, that the level of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) indeed does have the potential to have a positive effect on the world's average superficial temperature (the so-called greenhouse effect ), and that the measurements and resulting assumptions and graphic depictions, shown here, of past levels of atmospheric CO2 and superficial temperatures - within their stated temporal and spatial limitations - are correct , and that any other statements and depictions I call upon as witness are correct as well; and meaningful . If this is so , then a simple evaluation of the following graphs, for which there are either multiple sources, such as for the following ( from here ): or, from h...

Observations on Climate Change pt 2

Copied from  thermodynamicsociety.substack.com Comparing the Time Frames (500 million years of climate change) Planetary temperature fluctuations: Internal or external causes? Lately, the focus in things climate change has shifted from Thunberg (perceived cause: internal forces ) back to Milankovic (perceived cause: external forces ) and back again within just a few months. Nevertheless, the fact remains that, though astronomic or cosmic cycles and positions can be predicted with utmost precision, weather and climate on Earth still and most obviously can not ; it seems there may be other factors involved; like - well, perhaps, indeed, the makeup of the planet's atmosphere. So, the following is premised on the assumption that, just as does the Sun's intensity, the position of Earth in Space, and even its own geothermal heat, atmospheric carbon dioxide can and does influence this planet's surface temperature ; at least it is doing so under the current ...

There was a Land

There was a Land - where the wind blows cold over empty land ... Written and read by  Agnes Miegel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=au5wsjtHWRc (Born 1879 in Königsberg , Prussia ; died 1964) (& damn good looking she was as well, if I may say so, old chap!) Shortened and set to Pink Floyd's " Shine On You Crazy Diamond Pt I " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UXircX3VdM By someone I don't know, salvaged, damaged, from a cassette deck and repaired: Agnes Miegel There was a Land [Es war ein Land] (MP3) Enjoy, or recoil, as you will. There was a land ... Where ashes blow easier than dust and sand Where nettles grow high on burst, broken walls And higher still thistles on the edge of the land. There was a land - where are you, time? Where rye billowed as wide as the sea Where thrushes sang from the alder tree When herd and foal went to water. Farm up, farm down, like a gentle heart rang The tapping ...