Skip to main content

counting

Economics, Science, and Religion 4

[4]


previous     /     next slide

The question of value enhancement through labor was inadvertently addressed by Rudolf Clausius, who in the time of 1850 - 1865 published his physical theories on the constantly evolving steam engine and its mechanical progeny.

Less well known publicly than Marx or Darwin, he studied the physical basis of heat or combustion engines and formulated after them the laws of heat mechanics, partly known as the first and second law of thermodynamics.

Above all, these stated that real "added value" could not be generated by such a machine.

[And, to be clear, man, as any animal, is one]


On the contrary:



The operation of a heat engine alone generates a physical, i. e. real, loss - and this relentlessly so; work always creates an inferior or subtracted value, as compared to the initial situation.

Every step along the way worsens the preconditions for the next; resources that cannot be replenished by work, after having undergone the work process, are physically worth less than before.

Always and everywhere.


On the one hand, the scientists involved in these studies recognized that their newly-discovered natural laws were valid throughout the universe; its very existence depended upon this being so. The physical balance of work performed was always negative, everywhere.

On the other hand, these laws seemed elusive in a way; they could not (to this day) be formulated definitively and unambiguously; this was especially true of the term entropy, which was introduced by Clausius in 1865, and which in further course was subject to several changes. 


In the end, a mechanical invention of man had been examined for the physical basis of its profitability; the result was a law that was valid throughout the entire cosmos, stating that nothing comes from nothing.


Then where did it all come from, if not from God?


As it was clear now, no mechanical process, if only because of the previously "to be neglected" friction, was ever really reversible; thus it was unable to even sustain itself, let alone ever to yield a physical gain.

And, that should be emphasized here, life is such a process.

So, if this law applied to machines, then it applied to animals and humans as well, consciously or not; so similar were they in their requirements - and their performance.


Was Marx, along with the "capitalists", thus disproved?

And would this imply that all events in the universe were not only dynamic, but, due to their irreversibility, also directed in their dynamics? Or perhaps even purposive?


Once again, the question was raised of the closure of Creation.


previous     /     next slide

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

360 Degrees - Division in Time and Space

360 Degrees The partitioning of time and space into 360 steps Partitioning a whole into 360 degrees / 60 minutes with a compass and a ruler as universal instruments for the division of space and time The partitioning of a full circle as a representative of the whole into 360 degrees goes back to Babylonian times of farming and simple technology  - 5000 years ago, around 3000 BC to 300 BC. Our current decimal number system is based on the number 10; their numerical system was based on the number 60 . In those days, the emphasis was not , as it is today, on arbitrarily precise mathematics, but on those principally so; it was not about calculations ( these were then neither possible nor needed ), but about division and construction of artifacts with available aids . Within simple life, symmetry, dividing evenly, and fair and correct sharing, are of big, if not existential importance. Since reality itself is but an approxim...
Post a Comment
Read more

German humor

😀   Rough and politically wrong. In a fake TV documentary many years ago, some faked 'Citizens of Poland' in very loud clothes 'claimed' that their deceased uncle had authored every pop song of the last century, and proceeded to prove this by playing them with tubas and other very loud instruments - making every one sound like a polka. The whole extended family joins in, ' Seductive Sis ' sings while her pay-by-call phone number is displayed on the screen, and so on. "Having stolen their electricity" (another bad cliche, if anything, we're stealing theirs), they are 'forced' to turn the volume down to a whisper from their side so as not to attract too much attention, thereby forcing everyone watching the show to turn up their own TV sets to *full volume* so as to even hear anything - knowing full well they would suddenly turn it up again at the other end, but not WHEN... After lulling the audience by drawing it into the nati...
Post a Comment
Read more

Economics, Science, and Religion 2

[2] previous     /     next slide In 1859 , Charles Darwin published his observations on the origin of species , which introduced the concept of evolution into the social discussion: not only in the field of biology , but, as a side effect, in geology as well; the world was no longer static , a completed creation, but a dynamic one, constantly evolving; or at least it had been in the past . However, Creation itself was still in some way considered to be complete and static , at least as far as it was projected into the future ; meaning that evolution may have been the way things had developed up to the present , but no further ; the question why this should be so was carefully avoided. This is just one of the many unsolved paradoxes and mysteries resulting from the incomplete implementation of the discoveries made during the era of industrialization: If the world and its human inhabitants are the result of an evolutionary process, then that ...
Post a Comment
Read more