Skip to main content

counting

Economics, Science, and Religion 4

[4]


previous     /     next slide

The question of value enhancement through labor was inadvertently addressed by Rudolf Clausius, who in the time of 1850 - 1865 published his physical theories on the constantly evolving steam engine and its mechanical progeny.

Less well known publicly than Marx or Darwin, he studied the physical basis of heat or combustion engines and formulated after them the laws of heat mechanics, partly known as the first and second law of thermodynamics.

Above all, these stated that real "added value" could not be generated by such a machine.

[And, to be clear, man, as any animal, is one]


On the contrary:



The operation of a heat engine alone generates a physical, i. e. real, loss - and this relentlessly so; work always creates an inferior or subtracted value, as compared to the initial situation.

Every step along the way worsens the preconditions for the next; resources that cannot be replenished by work, after having undergone the work process, are physically worth less than before.

Always and everywhere.


On the one hand, the scientists involved in these studies recognized that their newly-discovered natural laws were valid throughout the universe; its very existence depended upon this being so. The physical balance of work performed was always negative, everywhere.

On the other hand, these laws seemed elusive in a way; they could not (to this day) be formulated definitively and unambiguously; this was especially true of the term entropy, which was introduced by Clausius in 1865, and which in further course was subject to several changes. 


In the end, a mechanical invention of man had been examined for the physical basis of its profitability; the result was a law that was valid throughout the entire cosmos, stating that nothing comes from nothing.


Then where did it all come from, if not from God?


As it was clear now, no mechanical process, if only because of the previously "to be neglected" friction, was ever really reversible; thus it was unable to even sustain itself, let alone ever to yield a physical gain.

And, that should be emphasized here, life is such a process.

So, if this law applied to machines, then it applied to animals and humans as well, consciously or not; so similar were they in their requirements - and their performance.


Was Marx, along with the "capitalists", thus disproved?

And would this imply that all events in the universe were not only dynamic, but, due to their irreversibility, also directed in their dynamics? Or perhaps even purposive?


Once again, the question was raised of the closure of Creation.


previous     /     next slide

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

(Re-)Tracing the Continental Drift

Is the Superrotation of the Earth's Core Driving the Continental Drift?   View Now!   Trace the Continental Drift! Tracing the Continental Drift Page  I     II   III   IV   V   For a different layout, you can go to my old _ page or to my substack [ This was written in September 1997 - but edited more than once since then! ] Scientists have known for long that the Sun's photosphere rotates faster at the equator than at the poles. Now here is a theory I have been working on as a hobby for the last 10 to 15 years, since around 1982: That this is a common trait of all rotating stellar objects which are able to do so, be they liquid or gaseous, big or small, from galaxies over stars and planetary systems down to the planets themselves. This would be because when rotating objects contract due to t...
Post a Comment
Read more

God and the World

A thermodynamic universe ends up as a cold, dead cloud A gravitational one as today's cosmos This is not about the neo-pagan animism of re-assigning souls to trees, stones or waters, to ask them for permission, forgiveness and protection, and certainly not about addressing a ball of glowing liquid rock (or a dead stone like the Moon), as a living being, by the name of ' Gaia '. Quite to the contrary That could be seen a superstitious expression of a free-floating need for a religious anchor, which 'modern' people once had, but lost, subsequently filling their internal cavernous vacancy with a belief in their own thermodynamics - which theoretically cannot sustain itself, an internal contradiction which is so often blissfully ignored: It is surprising how many people seem to be consciously unaware that the laws of thermodynamics relentlessly apply to themselves as well, individually and collectively. " The LORD giveth, and the LORD tak...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Definition of Speed pt.II

From the general and historical perspective in the definition of speed , let's have a look at the final two options: Velocity ( v ) or rather speed is now defined as distance by time or d / t , and measured in km/h , m/s , mph or something equivalent. Wikipedia : " Italian physicist Galileo Galilei is usually credited with being the first to measure speed by considering the distance covered and the time it takes. Galileo defined speed as the distance covered per unit of time. In equation form, that is v=d/t " However, I suppose Roman legions , comparing troop movements, and even ice age hunters used similar equations - it's a natural definition for a sentient being, at once a predator and prey , to cover movement in time and space , and defining it by the relation of distance to time . Speed , defined as distance by time or d/t , increases with distance and decreases with time . This worked for eons; we instinctively appreciate speed th...
Post a Comment
Read more