Skip to main content

counting

Order, Complexity and Information

Order and Complexity in view of Information

Order and Complexity have been used almost synonymously in this concept of gravitationally induced order throughout the universe; and though they are not quite the same, rightfully so.

What has been missing is that order and complexity convey information.

And this plays into the concept of entropy vs. negentropy (or negative entropy, which, again, does not exist; what is meant is less entropy.)

1.    One manifestation or concept of entropy is that of disorder; ergo, the opposite, negative entropy, manifests itself as negative disorder, less disorder or, simply, order.

2.    Another concept describes negative entropy as a measure of the information content of a system; the more entropy a system expresses, the less information it contains:

  • Maximum disorder is maximum disorder.
  • Maximum order is maximum order (which is far more difficult to express or assert).

  • Comparing two identical heaps of children's building blocks - or atoms (and we will stay on that level, as the makeup of plastic and color is irrelevant to the problem) - both of which are in the same state of disorder, having been run through several cycles of (thermodynamic) mixing, the state of both heaps can be declared to have an information content of zero in comparison (i. e., the two are indistinguishable).

    Of course, this is not strictly true, as any picture comparison will show; however, the differences are purely random, and one heap will not yield any more information than the other; both have the same number of particles, and whatever colors (or shapes and sizes) surround a certain block is indeterminable without looking.

    Now, introducing order by separating these particles into separate heaps according to color (or shape, size, weight…) introduces several levels of information; such as, how many differences there are at all, according to the chosen criterion, and how many blocks there are of each; and, surprisingly enough, that information is universal or transferable - if the two heaps are sufficiently similar, that information, gleaned from the sorted heap, can be used to infer that the same information be valid for the untreated heap.

    By inducing a higher level of order (or negative entropy) into one system, a higher level of information is available for every similar system throughout the cosmos: for instance, by looking at the gravitationally induced order of the solar system, we assume, automatically, that any stellar system in any galaxy in the universe, comprised of similar elements, will show a similar, if not identical kind of arrangement; we assume, furthermore, that stars and planets generally will be spheres, and not cubes; and so on.

    Now, we can introduce ever more higher levels of order, by not only sorting the building blocks into separate heaps according to color, but by separating them further into subheaps of shape, size, and weight; or whatever else comes to mind (or, in a greater context, is affected by gravity and other factors and forces playing into the sorting process, such as viscosity of the surroundings, etc.); and we can even arrange theses subheaps in a certain sequence, such as according to color wavelength or other criteria.

    We could also, on the other hand, use the sorted building blocks to actually build any randomized or predetermined construction, i. e. fix their location in relation to each other; and again, if the random heaps of material we started from are sufficiently similar (or indeed identical), the information gleaned from one heap can be transferred to the second one-on-one, either by simply and justifiably assuming it to be so, or by actually physically copying one pattern onto the other.

    Nothing else is done by biological body cells.

    From this, one can argue that introducing order (or negative entropy) into a system, predominantly by separation (for even for the combination of two elements these have first to be separated from the others), complexity is introduced; and with that, information.

    A house, built of different materials, holds untold amounts of information (this is wood; this is mortar; it separates and binds two or more bricks in a certain, repetitive pattern, which will change according to need), and meta- information (this is a window; this is a door; this is a corridor separating and connecting two rooms; in fact, these are rooms, built to purpose a, b, and c…), as well as arbitrary information (this wall was painted green).

    Reducing that house to rubble (i. e. throwing its elements into an entropic disarray) destroys almost every bit of information contained in its former array or (negentropic) order. And grinding these elements into a dust and blending this dust into a single, indistinguishable heap will destroy even more information.

    Strangely enough, a similar house standing nearby, undemolished, will still contain, and retain, most of the information which has been lost forever in the thermodynamically created dustheap.

    And, arguably, any uniform heap of dust has an extremely low degree of complexity; the house it once represented had a far higher one (which furthermore can be enhanced almost indefinitely, by, individually or collectively, having it filled with furniture and other content).

    Of course, in this case, both the construction and destruction were willful thermodynamic acts, and therefore enhanced entropy overall within the meta-system.

    However, it shows that "negative" or low entropy, enhanced order, complexity, and high information content go hand in hand; and therefore, so do high entropy, less order, low complexity, and minimal information.

    And, as has been argued here, "negative" or low entropy, enhanced order and higher complexity can be induced into any material system from within through the singular and monopolar force of gravity; and therefore, information.

    This process of information building begins with the formation of separate stars within a primary, almost informationless cloud of hydrogen; and does not end with two separate, singularly complex body cells communicating (i. e. sending and receiving information) with the help of ordered chemicals or ordered pulses of energy.

    For indeed, ordered they must be, for that body to be termed healthy - or even alive.

    And, in every single case, the origin of that order, complexity and information can be traced, eventually, to a an act of gravity (or an, if interrupted, series of gravitational processes).



    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    360 Degrees - Division in Time and Space

    360 Degrees The partitioning of time and space into 360 steps Partitioning a whole into 360 degrees / 60 minutes with a compass and a ruler as universal instruments for the division of space and time The partitioning of a full circle as a representative of the whole into 360 degrees goes back to Babylonian times of farming and simple technology  - 5000 years ago, around 3000 BC to 300 BC. Our current decimal number system is based on the number 10; their numerical system was based on the number 60 . In those days, the emphasis was not , as it is today, on arbitrarily precise mathematics, but on those principally so; it was not about calculations ( these were then neither possible nor needed ), but about division and construction of artifacts with available aids . Within simple life, symmetry, dividing evenly, and fair and correct sharing, are of big, if not existential importance. Since reality itself is but an approximation on the mathematically correc

    German humor

    😀   Rough and politically wrong. In a fake TV documentary many years ago, some faked 'Citizens of Poland' in very loud clothes 'claimed' that their deceased uncle had authored every pop song of the last century, and proceeded to prove this by playing them with tubas and other very loud instruments - making every one sound like a polka. The whole extended family joins in, ' Seductive Sis ' sings while her pay-by-call phone number is displayed on the screen, and so on. "Having stolen their electricity" (another bad cliche, if anything, we're stealing theirs), they are 'forced' to turn the volume down to a whisper from their side so as not to attract too much attention, thereby forcing everyone watching the show to turn up their own TV sets to *full volume* so as to even hear anything - knowing full well they would suddenly turn it up again at the other end, but not WHEN... After lulling the audience by drawing it into the nati

    Economics, Science, and Religion 2

    [2] previous     /     next slide In 1859 , Charles Darwin published his observations on the origin of species , which introduced the concept of evolution into the social discussion: not only in the field of biology , but, as a side effect, in geology as well; the world was no longer static , a completed creation, but a dynamic one, constantly evolving; or at least it had been in the past . However, Creation itself was still in some way considered to be complete and static , at least as far as it was projected into the future ; meaning that evolution may have been the way things had developed up to the present , but no further ; the question why this should be so was carefully avoided. This is just one of the many unsolved paradoxes and mysteries resulting from the incomplete implementation of the discoveries made during the era of industrialization: If the world and its human inhabitants are the result of an evolutionary process, then that process is ongoing