Skip to main content

counting

The Mad Matrix

 

A Game of Choice

This still isn't exactly what I was looking for, but for the time being...:

Caveat:

I have no idea if this is valid enough to serve as a pattern or rule, or if it's just a function of pick- and- choose selection or simple coincidence.

In other words, I have no idea if there is a counterexample that would show the opposite, or otherwise inconsistent results.

The problem or task:


  • If given three known factors A, B, and C, is there a "blind" mechanical method for testing which of several possibilities of relation would be valid, and which would not?

  • And how many possibilities of relation are there at all?



The way I see it, the factors A, B, and C can be connected by multiplication in three distinct ways:

A=BC, B=AC, or C=AB

i. e. one as the result of the other two multiplied.


Expressing that relation by division is just a transformation or resolution of the above, in order:

A=BC, A=B/C, A=C/B

B=AC, B=C/A, B=A/C

C=AB, C=A/B, C=B/A


So all in all there are nine possibilities of relation; three products and six fractions.

Taking the physical formula for speed, we would have:


v=dt v=t/d v=d/t
t=dv t=d/v t=v/d
d=tv d=v/t d=t/v

(v=velocity or speed, d=distance travelled, t=time elapsed)


Checking the formula for speed

Now, focussing on the six fractions, check the mathematical formula for physical validity (all else remaining equal):

[Checking the different mathematical formulas for physical consistency; if either factor in a random mathematical product grows or diminishes physically, does the result do so as well?

Note that the two formulas found to be valid are interchangeable; and so are three pairs of products, bringing their number back to three.

So, magically (and relying on that, hopefully, no mistakes were made), this seems to have worked out fine for the formula for speed.


Checking the formula for electrical resistance

Let's check with the formula for electrical resistance (R=resistance, I=current, U=voltage):

[Checking the different mathematical formulas for physical consistency; if either factor in a random mathematical product grows or diminishes physically, does the result do so as well?

Again, depending on that no mistakes were made, it looks like the same result.

And so, everybody knows what's coming: Yes, of course, the hobby horse!


Checking the formula for entropy

Everybody do their thing… I have no idea…

[Checking the different mathematical formulas for physical consistency; if either factor in a random mathematical product grows or diminishes physically, does the result do so as well?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Observations on Climate Change pt 2

Copied from  thermodynamicsociety.substack.com Comparing the Time Frames (500 million years of climate change) Planetary temperature fluctuations: Internal or external causes? Lately, the focus in things climate change has shifted from Thunberg (perceived cause: internal forces ) back to Milankovic (perceived cause: external forces ) and back again within just a few months. Nevertheless, the fact remains that, though astronomic or cosmic cycles and positions can be predicted with utmost precision, weather and climate on Earth still and most obviously can not ; it seems there may be other factors involved; like - well, perhaps, indeed, the makeup of the planet's atmosphere. So, the following is premised on the assumption that, just as does the Sun's intensity, the position of Earth in Space, and even its own geothermal heat, atmospheric carbon dioxide can and does influence this planet's surface temperature ; at least it is doing so under the current ...

360 Degrees - Division in Time and Space

360 Degrees The partitioning of time and space into 360 steps Partitioning a whole into 360 degrees / 60 minutes with a compass and a ruler as universal instruments for the division of space and time The partitioning of a full circle as a representative of the whole into 360 degrees goes back to Babylonian times of farming and simple technology  - 5000 years ago, around 3000 BC to 300 BC. Our current decimal number system is based on the number 10; their numerical system was based on the number 60 . In those days, the emphasis was not , as it is today, on arbitrarily precise mathematics, but on those principally so; it was not about calculations ( these were then neither possible nor needed ), but about division and construction of artifacts with available aids . Within simple life, symmetry, dividing evenly, and fair and correct sharing, are of big, if not existential importance. Since reality itself is but an approxim...

Gravity and the Thermodynamics of Human Economy and Existence

Go on to the next article / content      Gravity and the Thermodynamics of Human Economy and Existence  The prerequisitions of life  The physical order of the material world  The source and the sink  Fast forward to life on Earth  You cannot short-circuit a thermodynamic process and then expect it to go on  A perhaps clearer summary of the above  A Second Opinion  The prerequisitions of life " What an organism feeds upon is negative entropy. ... Thus the device by which an organism maintains itself stationary at a fairly high level of he orderliness (=fairly low level of entropy) really consists continually sucking orderliness from its environment. ... An organism's astonishing gift of concentrating a 'stream of order' on itself and thus escaping that the decay into atomic chaos - of 'drinking orderliness' from a suitable environment - seems to be co...